Roche, GE Share H1N1 Preparedness
Strategies
By
Leigh Bailey, Freelance Journalist
In April of
2009, headlines worldwide sounded the alarm. With Mexico reporting 24 deaths
resulting from the H1N1 virus (better known as “Swine flu”), the media—backed
by the Center for Disease Control—predicted a pandemic outbreak of the flu that
had the potential to result in mortality rates comparable to the 1918 Spanish
flu pandemic, which killed as many as 100 million. Businesses and government
agencies alike prepared for the worst.
But by
July, the dire early predictions proved mostly unfounded. The virus—a new
strain of influenza
A virus subtype H1N1—was both less virulent and less deadly than first
feared. While some expressed concern that the virus could still prove deeply
disruptive, most heaved a collective sigh of relief.
However according to David Lapre,
Vice President of Technical Operations for Roche, the pharmaceutical enterprise,
letting down our collective guard is a mistake, and one that could prove very
costly.
“According to many experts,
we’re overdue as a planet for a devastating viral pandemic”, Lapre explains. “It’s not a matter of ‘if.’ It’s a matter
of ‘when.’”
“Before the
H1N1 virus - aka ‘Swine flu’ - scare, our big concern was the H5N1 virus - aka
‘Avian flu’, which unfortunately was much more lethal,” he continues. “No one can predict with certainty, but at
some point we will experience a strain with a combination of transmissibility
and mortality which will bring on an extremely disruptive and dangerous global
pandemic.”
In light of
what is presumed to be an eventuality, both the CDC and the World Health
Organization have strongly advocated that both government agencies and private
enterprises develop and maintain “pandemic preparedness plans” to minimize
disruption to business as usual.
Roche, as
the producer of Tamiflu™,
is on the front line of the global response to a flu pandemic. “As a result”,
says Lapre, “We’ve been extremely proactive and
vigilant in terms of developing viable and functional preparedness plans.” And
to encourage other companies to do the same, Roche is sharing the broad
outlines of that plan with any enterprise that is interested.
“We’ve put
information on the Internet and made ourselves available” to other
companies seeking to implement their own pandemic preparedness plan, Lapre says.
Essentially,
companies need to determine which critical operations they need to maintain,
and create a plan that ensures they have the ability to maintain them.
At Roche,
that meant determining which employees were essential to operations, and
developing a set of reliable and responsive suppliers who had also developed
and tested preparedness plans of their own.
“We stay in
contact with our suppliers to discuss demand our production orders, and assess the
readiness of the supply chain on a quarterly basis,” he explains. Roche also
asks suppliers to meet specific criteria to ensure they are able to meet demand
within a certain time frame.
Global Pandemic Meets Global
For
companies with large, global operations, pandemic outbreaks can pose
particularly complex problems.
Bob Weronik, Assistant Chief security
Officer for General Electric (GE), says varying responses to H1N1 across GEs theaters of operation required differing risk
management responses.
“Because
Swine flu has been a global event, GE’s corporate crisis management team has
coordinated the GE business crisis management teams across the company,” he
explains. “We rely heavily on these teams to tell us what’s going on in their
local areas” in creating site-specific risk management plans.
Site-specific
plans that take local or national events into consideration are essential,
because the threat and the response to the threat can differ significantly from
region to region, Weronik continues.
“The
response to SARS in
The
corporate crisis management team (CMT) at GE continues to hold weekly status
updates with operation-specific teams across the globe to ensure that everyone
has a clear understanding of the steps to be taken in the event of a significant
outbreak in their area.
“I think
some companies have been lulled into a false sense of security due to the
relatively mild symptoms of H1N1, but as a company with more than 300,000
employees and operations world wide, we at GE are taking H1N1 seriously,” he
says. “We’ve stayed on it and have been actively monitoring and revising our
risk management plans from the beginning.”
Joe
McMorrow, program manager with Cisco’s Supply Chain Risk Management team, says
the outbreak of H1N1 sent his Manufacturing Crisis Management Team, MCMT, into
immediate action. “We have a strong and
well connected supply chain risk management program in place, which enabled us
to respond very quickly,” he says.
Within forty-eight
hours of the Mexican Health Secretary’s announcement that the country was
experiencing a flu epidemic, the Cisco MCMT had conducted a risk assessment of
affected suppliers and partners in the region and had assembled an incident
specific team to mitigate the risk.
“Even now that the immediate threat seems
to have passed, at Cisco we continue to actively monitor medical and Government
updates from around the world to provide a localized response that supports our
employees, customers and business,” McMorrow says.
In this new globally connected
economy, companies are facing an increasing array of risks. A serious flu
outbreak is just one kind of risk to business continuity, but it’s one that is
likely to occur. An effective SCRM strategy, is one that is attuned to the needs of a company’s
market and customers, and is a necessity for any global company. The key success factors of any supply chain
risk program are; solid commitment from senior management,
processes to drive proactive supply chain and product risk mitigation, effective
crisis management capabilities, and continuous improvement, to allow the
program to adapt and evolve with the business.
Leah Bailey is a
Freelance Journalist for the SCRLC Newsletter